Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/29/1996 08:08 AM Senate FIN
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 468(FIN) am An Act making supplemental appropriations for the expenses of state government and making and amending appropriations; ratifying certain state expenditures; and providing for an effective date. Co-chairman Frank directed that the FY 96 supplemental budget be brought on for continued committee review. Dept. of Military and Veterans Affairs NICO BUS, Acting Director, Division of Administrative Services, Dept. of Natural Resources, came before committee and advised that he would be representing the Dept. of Military and Veterans Affairs on supplemental items. The $6.5 million for the National Guard and Naval Militia Retirement Program will provide additional solvency to the fund. The program is now funded at 17 percent. Co-chairman Frank inquired concerning the ratio of future savings to up- front moneys placed in the fund. Mr. Bus explained that the Governor requested $2.5 million for FY 97. The department asked the actuary to calculate the impact of the $5.5 million. The result was that for FY 97 the operating budget could be reduced by $850.0. If additional FY 96 funding is provided, the FY 97 operating budget could be further reduced. Co-chairman Frank asked that the department provide numbers "all the way up to full actuarial soundness." NANCY SLAGLE, Director of Budget Review, Office of Management and Budget, explained that projections indicate that a $10 million lump-sum contribution would reduce the FY 97 number to $1.2 million. At the request of Senator Randy Phillips, Mr. Bus provided a history of the program. He explained that a 1988 provision in the National Guard Retirement System allowed for lump-sum payments. Many of the participants request this payment when they retire. The fund was thus drawn down much faster than anticipated. That is the main reason for the present situation. Lump-sum payments are continuing, but the department is working with the division of retirement and benefits to solve the problem and will bring forth recommendations next year. Discussion followed between Senator Rieger and Mr. Bus regarding the target funding ratio for the program. Nancy Slagle advised that adding $5 million to the fund would raise the ratio from the present 17 percent to 53 percent. If $10 million were appropriated, funding would be at 88 percent. In response to questions from Senator Phillips, Mr. Bus voiced his understanding that with the requested $6.5 million in the supplemental plus FY 97 operating budget funding, the program should be stabilized. Mr. Bus explained that the $1.5 million for disaster relief has two elements. The first is $557.0 for floods in the Kenai area. The total cost of the flood exceeded $3 million. The department found most of the needed funding within existing appropriations. The $557.0 request represents the remainder. The second part of the supplemental seeks $1 million for activity between the present time and June 30, 1996. In response to a question from Co-chairman Frank concerning House Finance action, Mrs. Slagle explained that the House funded the $1 million. The Governor included $1.5 million in his original request, for response to emergency needs. Mrs. Slagle voiced concern on behalf of the administration that "We have no other moneys available to respond to disasters through the end of the fiscal year." The department has functioned thus far on outstanding balances from previous disasters. Dept. of Natural Resources NICO BUS again came before committee to speak to the $5,258.6 for fire suppression which he said would fund remaining activity through FY 96. Included is the balance of fixed costs for aviation contracts, suppression, and other efforts. It also includes $750.0 for routine suppression activity (initial attack) as well as $2 million for project fires. Mr. Bus referenced $1.5 million that was to carry over from FY 96 to '97. Due to a fire in June, the funding was used in 1995. The department presently has $9,000.00 remaining. Aviation contracts are due April 1. The department should not technically obligate these $200.0 payments to vendors if there is not sufficient funding. If contracts are cancelled, vendors may commit their aircraft to other uses. Total need for these fixed costs is $2,256.4. That includes aviation, helicopters, tanker craft, fixed wing craft, etc. These are basic commitments the department makes to prepare for the fire season. Discussion of past fire seasons followed. Mr. Bus acknowledged that last year's season was one of the lowest on record. In response to a question from Co-chairman Halford concerning costs for the $236.0 listed as "aviation section," Mr. Bus explained that it relates to in-house expenditures for staff that manages aviation contracts. Mr. Bus advised that he would provide a spread sheet listing individual items of the supplemental request. Discussion followed among the co-chairmen and Mr. Bus concerning whether this effort should be included within fixed operating costs or within the supplemental. Mr. Bus noted that last year the department used a portion of its fixed cost funding for actual fire suppression because funding for suppression was so small. Further discussion followed regarding the nature of aviation and BLM smoke-jumper contracts. In response to a question from Senator Phillips, Mr. Bus said that predictions indicate this is a potentially high fire year, mainly in the interior. Co-chairman Frank asked that Mr. Bus speak to the $1,457.0 in uncollectible federal receivables. Mr. Bus advised that both the department and the Dept. of Law are working with federal agencies to obtain a settlement. Dept. of Law Co-chairman Frank directed that review revert to discussion of Dept. of Law requests. BARBARA RITCHIE, Deputy Attorney General, Civil Division, Dept. of Law, came before committee to speak to Berger v. State. She explained that the situation commenced in 1989 when Roger Berger, dba Frontier Financial Services, began to purchase permanent fund dividends for $325 to $400. In return for the cash, Mr. Berger received an assignment of individual rights to the $873 dividend. The Dept. of Revenue, permanent fund division, began to experience an escalation in the number of assignments. As a result, it took action to adopt a regulation under which it would decline to honor assignments other than those to governmental agencies. Frontier then required individuals who made assignments to complete a change of address form and power of attorney so that the dividend went directly to Frontier and was subsequently signed over by the borrower. The Dept. of Revenue noted circumvention of the new regulation and all parties were notified. In December of 1989, Frontier filed suit challenging the regulation and department refusal to implement the address changes. The superior court determined that the regulation was beyond statutory authority and thus invalid. The statute has since been changed to allow assignment only to a court or governmental agency. In arguing the case, the state raised issues of usury and violation of the small loans act. In December of 1995 the supreme court ruled that the transactions were not loans and returned the case to the superior court for a determination of "what was owed to Mr. Berger." In the meantime, the $873.00 permanent fund dividend was paid to the recipients. Discussion followed regarding advice in the above matter provided by the Dept. of Law to the Dept. of Revenue. VINCE USERA, Assistant Attorney General, Dept. of Law, voiced his understanding that former Assistant Attorneys General, Jeff Bush and Peter Froehlich, advised the Dept. of Revenue that it should not adopt the regulation. Co-chairman Halford voiced his understanding that the department was advised against adoption but did so anyway. He then asked for copies of memos containing Dept. of Law recommendations to the department. Discussion of the failed petition for rehearing before the supreme court followed between Mr. Usera and Senator Rieger. Further discussion followed regarding the stipulated judgment settling the amount versus a superior court trial to determine the amount. Addition discussion occurred regarding the legal standing of those who received both the advance from Mr. Berger and the dividend as well as Dept. of Revenue notification to recipients that the assignments would not be honored by the department. Senator Sharp noted that the $873.00 dividend for 1989, times the number of assignments (2,600), plus interest and attorney fees, does not approximate the requested $3.5 million. It thus appears that the "individual was made more than whole." Mrs. Ritchie noted that statutory interest on the $2.2 million at 10.5 percent for 74 months totaled "almost $1.3 million." Dept. of Public Safety NANCY SLAGLE again came before committee. She explained that the House decided the request for manuals and equipment should be considered within the capital budget. It was thus removed from the supplemental. Dept. of Revenue NANCY SLAGLE advised that the $198.2 request from Alaska Housing Finance Corporation relates to consolidation of leased facilities. Inability to construct a facility for AHFC has necessitated additional lease costs. JOHN BITNEY, Alaska Housing Finance Corporation, came before committee. He explained that the FY 96 budget contained funding for lease payments for six months in anticipation that AHFC would occupy its own facility when leases expired in December. Since the corporation will be remaining in current facilities, the above request is for the remaining six months of this fiscal year as well as a rate increase which incurred. In response to a question from Co-chairman Frank, Mr. Bitney noted that the overall budget was reduced by $2.5 million. He said he had no answer to a question regarding where moneys would be derived if supplemental funding is not provided. Responding to a question from Senator Sharp, Mr. Bitney advised that the rate increased from $1.27 to $1.30 per square foot. Co-chairman Frank asked that Senator Sharp, chairman of the subcommittee on the Dept. of Revenue budget, review the matter and forward a recommendation to committee. Co-chairman Frank inquired concerning the status of space for the corporation. Mr. Bitney acknowledged an RFP for new leases and receipt of six bids. No new leases would be entered before July 1, 1996. The RFP has no relation to the supplemental request. END: SFC-59, Side 1 BEGIN: SFC-59, Side 2 NANCY SLAGLE noted that Sec. 12(b) involves a fund source change between PERS and benefit system receipts. The FY 96 budget inadvertently cut too much out of receipts and brought the total to $19,200.00. The shift will cover costs and ensure that charges are made to proper benefit system accounts. BETTY MARTIN, Comptroller, Division of Treasury, Dept. of Revenue, came before committee. She explained that a portion of the shortage results from the fact that "the SBS accounts went participant directed over the last year . . . ." Management fees for the change were not in the FY 96 budget when it was prepared. The remainder is due to a miscalculation in performance measurement fees. There are two structures for these fees. One is for active management and the other is for passive management. Fees included in the budget reflect passive management when SBS accounts are actively managed. Dept. of Law Discussion next reverted to Sec. 9(c), the $66.6 for a district attorney in Bethel. LAURIE OTTO, Deputy Attorney General, Criminal Division, Dept. of Law, came before committee. She attested to three-person offices for both the public defender and the district attorney in Bethel. Last August, two of the public defenders quit. One of them was hospitalized for a stress-related disease. One of the district attorneys quit, and another actively began asking for transfer to another job. The third described himself as desperate. Ms. Otto said that, when she visited the area and reviewed statistics, she found that staff in Bethel is carrying double and sometimes triple the caseload of other offices. In response to a question from Senator Phillips, seeking the root of the heavy caseload, Ms. Otto attested to a high rate of crime between ages 15 and 30. The Bethel region has "a very large number of people" in that age range. The Bethel office covers all 56 villages in the region. Comments followed by Ms. Otto and committee members regarding the impact of alcohol and prohibitions against alcohol in the area. Ms. Otto noted that Anchorage appears to be the source of much alcohol bootlegged into the region. Over 50 percent of the crime in the DA's office in Bethel comes for the villages. Serious crime in Bethel itself appears to involve local residents. A review of files, indicates that the office is not overcharging criminal actions. It appears that staff undercharges and does not pursue cases it should because of the overload. Staff is routinely working 70 to 80 hours a week and is only paid for 37.5. Ms. Otto said she returned from her review much alarmed by the situation and conveyed her concern to both the Governor and the Attorney General. Further review by staff from the Dept. of Corrections, Dept. of Health and Social Services, and Dept. of Public Safety concluded that an emergency situation exists. There is need for the fourth position requested in the supplemental. A similar position has been requested in the public defender agency. The effect of the fourth attorney is that staff will work six days a week instead of seven. In response to an inquiry from Senator Rieger, Ms. Otto cited sexual assault and domestic violence as the most frequently committed crimes in the area. In the state of Alaska, most crimes are alcohol-related. That is true in the Bethel region among its 30,000 residents. Responding to further questions from Senator Zharoff, Ms. Otto attested to an 82 percent increase in the amount of crime in Bethel while Nome and Dillingham have remained stable. She speculated that much of the increase is due to the fact that Bethel has the highest rate of unemployment, and there is no significant economy. It also has the highest rate of social problems such as child abuse and suicide. The problem is primarily economic. Co-chairman Halford concurred in the foregoing assessment. University of Alaska NANCY SLAGLE spoke to the request for monetary terms for the classified employees association and the Alaska community college federation of teachers for FY 96. The House wished to consider all monetary contracts at one time. Stale Dated Warrants Senator Randy Phillips asked if the state had developed general policies regarding stale dated warrants. NANCY SLAGLE said she was unaware of a time frame after which the state is no longer obligated to pay. The money was owed at some point in time. Statutes require an appropriation to cover warrants that are over two years old. Ratification of Overexpenditures NANCY SLAGLE explained that the administration has reviewed this area of concern. Legislative Audit identified several places where accounting records do not balance expenditures with appropriation levels, for a variety of reasons. Mrs. Slagle referenced audit and management review of the process and noted that the result of that review was furnished to members. The administration will continue to work with agencies to attempt to bring accounting records up to date. The next legislative session has been established as the deadline for cleaning up everything through FY 94. The intent is to clean up accounts on an annual basis and attempt to avoid need for ratifications in the future. Mrs. Slagle noted that much of the $6,877.5 total involves the Dept. of Transportation and Public Facilities. It relates to conversion from the old PBA accounting system to the new system in 1983. Much of the problem resulted from lack of understanding, lack of training, lack of educated staff, etc. Backtracking has been difficult because of lack of documentation in early years. Mrs. Slagle reiterated that much of the problem within DOTPF occurred because moneys were received in a different year than expenditures were made. Collection of revenues was not aligned with expenditures. Co-chairman Frank announced that the committee would again meet at 9:30 a.m., Monday, April 1, 1996, to conclude review of supplemental requests. RECESS - 9:15 A.M. RECONVENE - 9:30 A.M.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|